ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the efficacy of a second dose of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine in children aged 6 to 7 years in Xicheng District, Beijing, China in 2016.Methods Serum samples were collected in duplicate from 41 children aged 6 to 7 years before and one month after immunization with a second dose of MMR vaccine.ELISA was performed to detect IgG antibodies against measles, rubella and mumps in serum samples.Results The positive rates of antibodies against measles, rubella and mumps in the 41 children before immunization with a second dose of MMR vaccine were 95.12%, 90.24% and 92.68% and the antibody titers were (825.88±499.91), (53.83±32.48) and (697.83±535.82) IU/ml, respectively.The positive rates of the three antibodies were 100%, 97.56% and 100% after revaccination with MMR vaccine and the antibody titers were (1 102.98±356.77), (95.08±26.88) and (3 383.85±1 903.06) IU/ml.Titers of antibodies against measles, rubella and mumps increased significantly following revaccination (P0.05).Conclusion The second dose immunization of MMR vaccine achieves a high successful rate in children in Xicheng District of Beijing.It would be an effective immunization strategy to protect children from measles, rubella and mumps.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: La vacunación frente al virus de la hepatitis B (VHB) es más efectiva en prediálisis pero en ocasiones el paciente llega a diálisis de forma no programada sin realizar vacunación completa previa. Pretendemos determinar el grado de respuesta a inmunización frente a VHB con diferentes esquemas en hemodiálisis. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudiamos 30 pacientes en hemodiálisis administrando 2 esquemas de vacunación frente a VHB. Un grupo realiza el esquema de 3 dosis (0, 1, 6 meses) (PAUTA 3) y otro de 4 dosis (0, 1, 2, 6 meses) (PAUTA 4). RESULTADOS: El 56.7% hizo pauta 3 con respuesta del 26.7% y el 43.3% hizo pauta 4 con 23.3% de respuesta, sin diferencias significativas entre ambas (p=0.6). La tasa de AcHBs postvacunacional fue significativamente mayor con pauta 4 (p<0.05) así como en las tasas de anticuerpos mantenidas al año; a los 2 años las tasas de anticuerpos no fueron significativamente diferentes entre ambas pautas. En el resto de análisis estadístico, la vacunación realizada en pacientes con más tiempo en diálisis tuvo mayor respuesta con pauta 4 (p<0.05) aunque con respecto a los niveles de anticuerpos no hubo diferencias en los que respondieron con cada pauta. CONCLUSIONES: No existen diferencias en la respuesta inmunológica a vacunación frente VHB en hemodiálisis entre esquemas de 3 y 4 dosis. Hay mayor respuesta con el esquema de 4 dosis en la vacunación en pacientes con mayor tiempo en diálisis. Por ello, aconsejamos realizar la inmunoprofilaxis con el esquema de 3 dosis en pacientes incidentes en hemodiálisis que no han sido vacunados anteriormente
INTRODUCTION: Vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) is more effective in pre-dialysis, but sometimes the patient has to start treatment in an unscheduled way, without full immunization coverage. We try to establish the immune response rate against HBV in hemodialysis with different vaccination schemes. METHODS: We studied 30 patients in hemodialysis program with 2 different vaccination schemes against HBV. One group performed a 3-doses scheme (0, 1 and 6 months) (PATTERN 3) and the other group performed a 4-doses scheme (0, 1, 2 and 6 months) (PATTERN 4). RESULTS: 56.7% performed pattern 3, with immune response of 26.7%. 43.3% performed pattern 4, with immune response of 23.3%, without significant differences between them (p=0.06). Anti-hepatitis B surface antibodies (anti-HBs) rate after vaccination was significantly higher with pattern 4 (p<0.05) as well as the antibodies counts maintained within 1 year. After 2 years, anti-HBs rates were not significantly different between both patterns. In other statical analysis, vaccination carried out in patients who have been for a long time in hemodialysis treatment, was more responsive with pattern 4 (p<0.05) although anti-HBs levels were similar in patients that had response with each pattern. CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences in immune response between 3-doses scheme and 4-doses scheme in HBV vaccination for hemodialysis patients. There is greater response with 4-doses scheme in hemodialysis patients who have not been vaccinated previously
Subject(s)
Humans , Renal Dialysis , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis B/prevention & controlABSTRACT
To investigate the status on vaccination for National Immunization Program ( NIP) among migrant children in Longwan District of Wenzhou City , and to explore the factors that influ-enced the vaccination rate in migrant children . [ Methods] By using PPS sampling method , a series of 366 migrant children who were born from January 1, 2009 to December 31,2011 were investigated for NIP vaccine immunization status by household visit in 30 towns. [ Results] The percentage of migrant chil-dren with vaccination card and vaccination certificate were 92 .90%and 99 .73%respectively .Vaccination coverage rates were Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG)(98.09%), 1 Oral Poliomyelitis Attenualed Live Vac-cine ( OPV ) ( 95 .08%) , 3 Diphtheria , Tetanus and Pertussis Combined Vaccine ( DTP ) ( 92 .90%) , 1 Measles Attenuated Live Vaccine (MV)(91.53%), 3 Hepatitis B Vaccine (HepB)(95.36%), 1 Japa-nese Encephalitis Vaccine ( JEV ) ( 65.30%), and 2 Meningococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine ( MPV ) (74.74%), Hepatitis A Vaccine(HepA)(61.34%).In addition, the coverage of HepB first doze timely vaccination was 88.52%,the scar rate of BCG was 96.58%.Five vaccines vaccination rate was 81.97%. The boosting vaccination rates of MCV ,DTP,and JEV were 78.87%,68.04%,and 57.95% respectively. The incidence of unqualified vaccination were 1.91%-42.05%, the highest being that of HepA and the lowest BCG . [ Conclusion] Basic immunization rates of BCG , OPV, DTP, MCB and HepB were higher than 90%, but their revaccinations and the vaccination rates of JEV , MPV and HepA were low , which was the weak link in management of migrant children .The main reasons for unqualified vaccination were extended vaccination , unvaccination or not full vaccination .
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of three-level network of vaccination on immunization rates of planned immunization vaccine,and provide science basis for planned immunization work.Methods Immunization rates of children in 131 villages under administration of Xiaolan People's Hospital of Zhongshan were investigated according to PPS from 2007 to 2010,and were compared before and after the establishment of three-level network of vaccination.Results After the establishment of three-level network of vaccination,rates of certification,and vaccination rates of OPV,DPT,and HBV were all increased significantly,vaccination rates of BCG were not raised obviously.Conclusions The establishment of three-level network of vaccination can increase immunization rates of planned immunization vaccine.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During seasonal influenza epidemics and previous pandemics, pregnant women have been at increased risk for complications related to influenza infection. Although influenza vaccination has been widely recommended to pregnant women and immunocompromised hosts, the vaccination rate is presumed to be low in pregnant women. This study was aimed to evaluate the vaccination rate and factors associated with Influenza vaccination among pregnant women, who are at high risk for developing complications from the influenza. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was carried out by telephone survey from April, 2007 to August, 2007. Women who were in their second trimester of pregnancy or above,- during October, 2006 and February, 2007, the recommended vaccination period, and had given birth at Inha University Hospital were selected as the study population. Immunization status, general understanding, and factors associated with vaccination were evaluated. RESULTS: Among a total of 506 eligible pregnant women, 227 (44.8%) responded to the questionnaires. The influenza vaccination rate among the pregnant women was only 4% (9/227). Major reasons for not receiving vaccination were first, not awaring the necessity of immunization during pregnancy (48.5%, 110/227) and second, misunderstanding that it is prohibited during pregnancy (36.1%, 82/227). The major factors that influenced the compliance of vaccination were correct understanding and doctor's recommendation on the influenza immunization during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The influenza vaccine coverage on pregnant women was very low and the awareness of influenza vaccination during pregnancy in general was inaccurate. Shift in perception is required and this can be achieved by educating the pregnant women on the safety and efficacy of vaccination. In addition, doctors' active encouragement to vaccination is highly recommended.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Compliance , Immunization , Immunocompromised Host , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Pandemics , Parturition , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Pregnant Women , Seasons , Telephone , Vaccination , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During seasonal influenza epidemics and previous pandemics, pregnant women have been at increased risk for complications related to influenza infection. Although influenza vaccination has been widely recommended to pregnant women and immunocompromised hosts, the vaccination rate is presumed to be low in pregnant women. This study was aimed to evaluate the vaccination rate and factors associated with Influenza vaccination among pregnant women, who are at high risk for developing complications from the influenza. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was carried out by telephone survey from April, 2007 to August, 2007. Women who were in their second trimester of pregnancy or above,- during October, 2006 and February, 2007, the recommended vaccination period, and had given birth at Inha University Hospital were selected as the study population. Immunization status, general understanding, and factors associated with vaccination were evaluated. RESULTS: Among a total of 506 eligible pregnant women, 227 (44.8%) responded to the questionnaires. The influenza vaccination rate among the pregnant women was only 4% (9/227). Major reasons for not receiving vaccination were first, not awaring the necessity of immunization during pregnancy (48.5%, 110/227) and second, misunderstanding that it is prohibited during pregnancy (36.1%, 82/227). The major factors that influenced the compliance of vaccination were correct understanding and doctor's recommendation on the influenza immunization during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The influenza vaccine coverage on pregnant women was very low and the awareness of influenza vaccination during pregnancy in general was inaccurate. Shift in perception is required and this can be achieved by educating the pregnant women on the safety and efficacy of vaccination. In addition, doctors' active encouragement to vaccination is highly recommended.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Compliance , Immunization , Immunocompromised Host , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Pandemics , Parturition , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Pregnant Women , Seasons , Telephone , Vaccination , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study was carried out to obtain the immunization rate of MMR, and to know the related factors. METHODS: Subjects of the study were 3,364 students of 8 elementary schools of Kyonggi province. Surveys accompanied with questionnaires were conducted in 1996 and 1999, respectively. RESULTS: The salient features of the findings were as follows : The immunization rate for MMR turned out to increase as the age of students becomes younger and the 2nd MMR coverage rate in the 1999 survey was 30%. The MMR immunization rate had a strong positive correlation with parental education and income levels. The 2nd MMR immunization rate also had a strong positive correlation with the level of parental education. The vaccination record-keeping rate increased from 30% in 1996 to 41% in 1999. Especially, 52% of freshmen had a record in 1999. The record keeping rate had a strong positive correlation with parental education and income levels. Vaccination places for MMR were hospital or clinics in 60% and public health centers in 39%. CONCLUSION: The vaccination coverage rate for MMR was 85.5% in 1996 and 83.0% in 1999, respectively. The immunization rate however was not high enough to be able to protect against the MMR epidemy. In particular, we should pay more attention to vaccinating the children whose parents' education or income level is low. And we need to have a program that will enhance coverage for the 1st and the 2nd MMR among school children.